Have you ever wondered about the people who run our country? They cost taxpayers’ £93 million a year Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Have you ever wondered about the people who run our country? They cost taxpayers’ £93 million a year Read more on New Deal Scandal »
As the entire UK goes crazy with shocking new plans of changing welfare in the country, New Deal Scandal reveals that the worse is still to come! You thought the Welfare Reform Bill was bad? Read on… Read more on New Deal Scandal »
New Deal Scandal recently reported that New Deal Provider Reed in Partnership was under investigation for multi-million pound fraud in 2001; we now can disclose that just two years later the Department for Work and Pensions was involved in a multi agency investigation of a fraud estimated at £3 million involving them finding jobs for illegal immigrants including failed asylum seekers.
DESPITE THESE TWO PREVIOUS MULTI-MILLION POUND FRAUDS:
Reed in Partnership still holds Government Contracts (including New Deal Prime Contractor, Employment Zone, Pathways to Work Phase 2). Where is the logic in that?
The illegal fraudulent act of:
and
and
… is known as “stalling“.
I can’t stress enough how great it is to have a job which is permanent and secured
Tonight I wish to raise the major unemployment issue: the System’s Cherry Pick or Park approach.
Regardless of being in a recession or not, there are two distinct groups of unemployed people that are jobseekers who are on benefits:
1) The Lucky.
The lucky group will only be unemployed for a short period typically between 2 weeks and six months and head back into sustainable long term fulltime employment. This employment is likely to be secured by knowing friends and family, and even keeping in the loop of internal job vacancies from previous employers rather than the overcrowded application processes.
and
2) The Unlucky.
The unlucky group is destined to remain longterm unemployed with the occassional unsustainable short jobs (Agency, temporary etc.) from anything between several hours a week here and there, and 4-9 months. The unlucky ones are forced to register for agencies who are only usually interested in promoting very casual work – which obviously are unsustainable, inadequate to live on, and without much notice (a phone call on the day to work is common) – and requires either signing off for the period (then signing back on afterwards) or going down to sign on and declare work resulting in no payment and probably a staff member reporting you to the fraud squad.
Wonder why there are so many agency jobs advertised at the Jobcentre?
89% of the recuitment industry in the UK is for temporary jobs. The Government is supporting this multi-billion pound industry and sticking the economy before people as usual (apart from with the banks of course). Putting it another way; the industry’s combined turnover for permanent jobs and normal non-permanent contract jobs make up only around one tenth (11%) of their annual income.
The rest is made up of short term casual short notice jobs. Do you want to be rung up at 7:30am asking if you can start work at 8am for 4 hours at minimum wage?
Employers prefer someone who has stuck at their job for long periods of time
No employer likes candidates who have worked on several different jobs in one year.
Jobseekers Allowance terminated
The jobcentre has for a while allowed jobseekers to be more choosey for jobs they apply for. Generally, if you aren’t better off working than receiving Jobseekers you don’t have to apply. Agency work on the other hand, is an exception to this rule – if you declined the above offer for example – you would likely receive a sanction for it.
New Deal
New Deal is infamous for “Cherry Picking” and “Parking”…
It actually is a human right for self-progression etc. it is not right for people to just be parked (like a car?) in the car park of unemployment waiting for petrol. Then someone comes along and hand washes the car. The car needs petrol! It doesn’t matter if the car looks brand new, still needs petrol to get anywhere! (don’t ask lol)
I don’t believe that the “clever” ones get the jobs and the “dumb” ones don’t. This is why I called the groups “lucky” and “unlucky”. Luck has a part in all this too. Feel free to leave a comment, if you are unemployed, stick which group you think you fall in to, looking back at past events and the current circumstances.
The Government department was involved in a racial experiment with recruitment processes says the Institute of Economic Affairs, which involved sending two identical applications for 1,000 jobs – the difference being one was a typical “white British” name and the other was from a pool of names from different “ethnic minority” groups to compare the outcome . The Equality and Human Rights Commission – those who failed to pick up on New Deal, the proposed Flexible New Deal and Welfare Reform Bill – urges a clause in the Equality Bill to ban names in application forms. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
This article focuses on Human Rights in the United Kingdom.
How does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights work in the United Kingdom? Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Today we saw a referrer from Seetec’s Webmail. The Operations Manager has read the blog post on “A4e to lose Flexible New Deal contract for fraud: other training providers also under investigation“… Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Many New Deal providers are using a whole range of fraudulent techniques to receive money unlawfully from the Government. The Government generally isn’t interested in knowing about these techniques, they only recognise the fraud that is forging employer signatures. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
New Deal Scandal network can announce that Action 4 Employment has two main companies which they swapped names of. We do not suggest that this act was an act of fraudulent company trading however we felt the suspicions of which is significant to match the allegations of widespread fraud in the organisation. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
We can reveal that on the 20th April 2009, Mr Neil Watson the Finance Director for Action 4 Employment resigned from a4e Ltd as a director. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
The Guardian newspaper has updated an article on their website which stated the fraud was for Flexible New Deal when in fact it was for the current New Deal system. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
New Deal Scandal can reveal that there were 1,869 allegations of fraud made against New Deal providers within the first 5 years – 15% of these allegations (or roughly 1 in 6) resulted in full fraud investigations being carried out. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
I would like to welcome Action 4 Employment who have recently visited this blog; it would look better if you commented on some of the A4e fraud issues mentioned on the site. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Evidence from 2003 has been uncovered showing information on fraud investigations of New Deal in the first 5 years of New Deal. You may have heard about cases regarding companies such as A4e, Maatwerk and Working Links being investigated for fraud, however, official Parliament documents show that up until winter 2002 there was over 278 in depth fraud investigations against New Deal providers, almost 2000 allegations of fraud committed by New Deal prime contractors and the rate of cases year on year seems to be on the increase. Read on for more! Read more on New Deal Scandal »
I have absolute no idea why the Government gets Ofsted (famous for schools) to do reports on New Deal providers. The problem is, whereas with schools, each school is individually assessed; with New Deal each contract region is assessed in just one annual report. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
The New Deal Scandal blog unique hits yesterday were still rising (at 22%) as concerns increase over Action 4 Employment and Working Links, the entire New Deal scheme which is very vulnerable to fraud and the Flexible New Deal. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Former Action 4 Employment (A4e) employee Elizabeth Orsman has been jailed for fraud with a total value of £15,833. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Both Action 4 Employment and Working Links publicly release a statement on the Channel 4 News report broadcast on the 30th June 2009, dated 28/06/2009 (A4e) and 29/06/2009 (Working Links) up to 2 days before the public were aware of their fraudulent activities. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
As from today the New Deal Scandal network will be also promoting the abolishment of the Jobseekers Agreement (JSAg), an proposed act of Welfare Reform Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Action for Employment founder and chairperson Emma Harrison discussion regarding scams: with video! Read more on New Deal Scandal »
Only a day later than when we reported
hits to this blog New Deal Scandal increased just under 10 times the previous average and 2.5 times more unique visitors than the previous day!
Ipswich Unemployed Action Blog has received 3.5 times more web traffic since reporting the New Deal fraud. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
The illegal act of:
… is known as “leeching“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
The illegal act of:
and
… is known as “misrepresentation“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
The illegal act of:
… is known as “exiting“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
This potentially fraudulent act involves:
The fraudulent element is as follows…
Or, This fraudulent act involves:
… is known as “Pre-signing“; the second definition is more likely to use that term in common dialogue. Read more on New Deal Scandal »
The illegal act of:
Or
… is known as “Penciling“.
If your New Deal provider ever wrote reviews and such like in pencil I would recommend you use the Data Protection Act 1998 to retrieve all the documents they hold on you (failing that if they say they no longer have it, try the Jobcentre) and see whether the content changed
The illegal forging act of:
… is known as “Windowing“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »