House of Common Criminals

Have you ever wondered about the people who run our country? They cost taxpayers’ £93 million a year Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in uk government. Tags: , , .
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Welfare Reform Bill: There is more to come…

As the entire UK goes crazy with shocking new plans of changing welfare in the country, New Deal Scandal reveals that the worse is still to come! You thought the Welfare Reform Bill was bad? Read on… Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Welfare Reform.
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Reed in Partnership and the £3 million illegal immigrant fraud

New Deal Scandal recently reported that New Deal Provider Reed in Partnership was under investigation for multi-million pound fraud in 2001; we now can disclose that just two years later the Department for Work and Pensions was involved in a multi agency investigation of a fraud estimated at £3 million involving them finding jobs for illegal immigrants including failed asylum seekers.

DESPITE THESE TWO PREVIOUS MULTI-MILLION POUND FRAUDS:

Reed in Partnership still holds Government Contracts (including New Deal Prime Contractor, Employment Zone, Pathways to Work Phase 2).   Where is the logic in that?

Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp, new deal fraud. Tags: , , , , , , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: “stalling”

The illegal fraudulent act of:

  1. Offering to post letters, CV’s and application forms / previous telling the participant that they will post them

    and

  2. Not posting the letters as previously said

    and

  3. Delaying the posting of them deliberately with intent so they would exceed deadlines

… is known as “stalling“.

Posted in New Deal, dwp, new deal fraud. Tags: .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Unemployed: Temporary or Parked?

I can’t stress enough how great it is to have a job which is permanent and secured

Tonight I wish to raise the major unemployment issue: the System’s  Cherry Pick or Park approach.

Regardless of being in a recession or not, there are two distinct groups of unemployed people that are jobseekers who are on benefits:

1) The Lucky.

The lucky group will only be unemployed for a short period typically between 2 weeks and six months and head back into sustainable long term fulltime employment. This employment is likely to be secured by knowing friends and family, and even keeping in the loop of internal job vacancies from previous employers rather than the overcrowded application processes.

and

2)   The Unlucky.

The unlucky group is destined to remain longterm unemployed with the occassional unsustainable short jobs (Agency, temporary etc.) from anything between several hours a week here and there, and 4-9 months. The unlucky ones are forced to register for agencies who are only usually interested in promoting very casual work – which obviously are unsustainable, inadequate to live on, and without much notice (a phone call on the day to work is common) – and requires either signing off for the period (then signing back on afterwards) or going down to sign on and declare work resulting in no payment and probably a staff member reporting you to the fraud squad.

Wonder why there are so many agency jobs advertised at the Jobcentre?

89% of the recuitment industry in the UK is for temporary jobs.  The Government is supporting this multi-billion pound industry and sticking the economy before people as usual (apart from with the banks of course). Putting it another way; the industry’s combined turnover for permanent jobs and normal non-permanent contract jobs make up only around one tenth (11%) of their annual income.

The rest is made up of short term casual short notice jobs. Do you want to be rung up at 7:30am asking if you can start work at 8am for 4 hours at minimum wage?

Employers prefer someone who has stuck at their job for long periods of time

No employer likes candidates who have worked on several different jobs in one year.

Jobseekers Allowance terminated

The jobcentre has for a while allowed jobseekers to be more choosey for jobs they apply for. Generally, if you aren’t better off working than receiving Jobseekers you don’t have to apply. Agency work on the other hand, is an exception to this rule – if you declined the above offer for example – you would likely receive a sanction for it.

New Deal

New Deal is infamous for “Cherry Picking” and “Parking”…

This has to stop!

It actually is a human right for self-progression etc. it is not right for people to just be parked (like a car?) in the car park of unemployment waiting for petrol. Then someone comes along and hand washes the car. The car needs petrol! It doesn’t matter if the car looks brand new, still needs petrol to get anywhere! (don’t ask lol)

Unemployed? What category have you fallen in to?

I don’t believe that the “clever” ones get the jobs and the “dumb” ones don’t. This is why I called the groups “lucky” and “unlucky”. Luck has a part in all this too. Feel free to leave a comment, if you are unemployed, stick which group you think you fall in to, looking back at past events and the current circumstances.

Posted in dwp. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , .
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Department for Work and Pensions: thousand bogus applications

The Government department was involved in a racial experiment with recruitment processes says the Institute of Economic Affairs, which involved sending two identical applications for 1,000 jobs – the difference being one was a typical “white British” name and the other was from a pool of names from different “ethnic minority” groups to compare the outcome . The Equality and Human Rights Commission – those who failed to pick up on New Deal, the proposed Flexible New Deal and Welfare Reform Bill – urges a clause in the Equality Bill to ban names in application forms. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in dwp. Tags: , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

What's the point in Human Rights?

This article focuses on Human Rights in the United Kingdom.

How does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights work in the United Kingdom? Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Seetec's Operations Manager reads news on A4e

Today we saw a referrer from Seetec’s Webmail. The Operations Manager has read the blog post on “A4e to lose Flexible New Deal contract for fraud: other training providers also under investigation“… Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in new deal fraud. Tags: .
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 1 Comment »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud: the techniques used to rip off the taxpayer

Many New Deal providers are using a whole range of fraudulent techniques to receive money unlawfully from the Government. The Government generally isn’t interested in knowing about these techniques, they only recognise the fraud that is forging employer signatures. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

A4e fraud and the company switch

New Deal Scandal network can announce that Action 4 Employment has two main companies which they swapped names of. We do not suggest that this act was an act of fraudulent company trading however we felt the suspicions of which is significant to match the allegations of widespread fraud in the organisation. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

a4e New Deal: Finance Director resigned

We can reveal that on the 20th April 2009, Mr Neil Watson the Finance Director for Action 4 Employment resigned from a4e Ltd as a director. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, dwp, new deal fraud. Tags: , , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Guardian admits mistake: New Deal Fraud NOT Flexible New Deal

The Guardian newspaper has updated an article on their website which stated the fraud was for Flexible New Deal when in fact it was for the current New Deal system. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal.
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

1,869 fraud tip offs in the first half of New Deal

New Deal Scandal can reveal that there were 1,869 allegations of fraud made against New Deal providers within the first 5 years – 15% of these allegations (or roughly 1 in 6) resulted in full fraud investigations being carried out. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Welcome A4e: don't be shy, leave feedback

I would like to welcome Action 4 Employment who have recently visited this blog; it would look better if you commented on some of the A4e fraud issues mentioned on the site. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment. Tags: .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal Fraud: Over 278 full fraud investigations

Evidence from 2003 has been uncovered showing information on fraud investigations of New Deal in the first 5 years of New Deal. You may have heard about cases regarding companies such as A4e, Maatwerk and Working Links being investigated for fraud, however, official Parliament documents show that up until winter 2002 there was over 278 in depth fraud investigations against New Deal providers, almost 2000 allegations of fraud committed by New Deal prime contractors and the rate of cases year on year seems to be on the increase. Read on for more! Read more on New Deal Scandal »

New Deal Ofsted reports are meaningless

I have absolute no idea why the Government gets Ofsted (famous for schools) to do reports on New Deal providers.  The problem is, whereas with schools, each school is individually assessed; with New Deal each contract region is assessed in just one annual report. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in dwp, new deal fraud. Tags: , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 1 Comment »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud: Concerns rise as news spreads

The New Deal Scandal blog unique hits yesterday were still rising (at 22%) as concerns increase over Action 4 Employment and Working Links, the entire New Deal scheme which is very vulnerable to fraud and the Flexible New Deal. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, Working Links, dwp, new deal fraud.
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud: A4e employee jailed for fraud

Former Action 4 Employment (A4e) employee Elizabeth Orsman has been jailed for fraud with a total value of £15,833. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal Fraud: A4e and Working Links response

Both Action 4 Employment and Working Links publicly release a statement on the Channel 4 News report broadcast on the 30th June 2009, dated 28/06/2009 (A4e) and 29/06/2009 (Working Links) up to 2 days before the public were aware of their fraudulent activities. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, Working Links, dwp. Tags: , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Abolish the Jobseekers Agreement

As from today the New Deal Scandal network will be also promoting the abolishment of the Jobseekers Agreement (JSAg), an proposed act of Welfare Reform Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Welfare Reform, dwp. Tags: , , , , , .
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

a4e fraud: Emma Harrison speaks on scams

Action for Employment founder and chairperson Emma Harrison discussion regarding scams: with video! Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, flexible new deal. Tags: , , , , , , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Hits increase 10 TIMES while a4e remain under investigation

Only a day later than when we reported

New Deal Scandal record hits DOUBLE on news of A4e Fraud

hits to this blog New Deal Scandal increased just under 10 times the previous average and 2.5 times more unique visitors than the previous day!

Ipswich Unemployed Action Blog has received 3.5 times more web traffic since reporting the New Deal fraud. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, Ipswich.
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: “leeching”

The illegal act of:

  1. Forcing the New Deal participant to sign a disclaimer giving them permission to contact any future employers, by threatening dismissal if they decline (see “exiting” fraud technique)
  2. Contacting the participant’s New Deal Personal Adviser enquiring if they have found employment and with what employer. (NDPA’s are only too happy to disclose such information even when the term of your New Deal course has far been exceeded – i.e. Data Protection Act 1998 violation)
  3. Approaching the employer and making them fill in the paperwork required
  4. Claiming Job Outcome bonuses, intended as an incentive to find New Deal participants work, NOT to be abused like in this manner where work was found by the ex-New Deal participant after the course ended.

… is known as “leeching“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , , , .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: “misrepresentation”

The illegal act of:

  1. Bidding for a contract to a high specification in order to win the contract (this becomes part of the New Deal contract outlined in Part 3 (“The services”), Section 3 (“Provider obligations”) subsections 3.1.1 and 3.1.5, Schedule 2 (and applicable Annexes) and other applicable sections), Or
  2. Failing to follow Provider Guidance (breach of subsection 3.1.3 of New Deal contract)

    and

  3. Deliberately providing the service different to that promised at tender stage, where the standard is less, where financial cut backs are made to the delivery, understaffed, under resourced and overcrowded premises.

… is known as “misrepresentation“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, YMCA Training, dwp. Tags: , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: “exiting”

The illegal act of:

  1. Acknowledging that regardless of the actual period of time the New Deal participant spends on the course they will get the full amount for the entire 13 weeks, unless they exceed their absence limit where they wont
  2. Short listing those who appear not to be able to make the entire 13 weeks or those who are close to exceeding permitted absence limits to be dismissed – those who seem likely to “drop out” will not award provider with Job Outcome bonuses thus are surplus to requirements and those that are close to the limit regardless of being in their rights and not committing an offence are likely to become a liability to limit the amount projected to be received.
  3. Acknowledging that the Jobseeker cannot appeal or prevent being dismissed, has no rights to find out the reason for dismissal or have a chance to put right/get a second chance,  and that it takes immediate effect.
  4. Short listing random people for dismissal to ease overcrowding of training centres
  5. Making false declarations under oath of a disclaimer claiming reasons for dismissals as rather severe (misconduct, Health and safety concerns etc.) all being lies, knowing that the Dismissal Form has a sole purpose of helping a Decision Maker impose sanctions on a jobseeker, who doesn’t get to see such a form.
  6. Tell the Jobseeker verbally an entire  different story (such as due to attitude, not contributing enough etc.) consisting of rather mild reasons, so when he or she becomes required to give reasons why the training course ended or appeals to a decision of benefit sanctions,  the jobseeker merely complains about something irrelevant to the actual stated reason and becomes sanctioned as a result.
  7. When a Decision Maker writes to the Training Provider, the training provider delays the reply so when the Decision Maker writes to the Jobseeker, he or she doesn’t get a copy of the answers provided as the system is intended to do.
  8. Now that the people were exited – the training providers profit margins further reach the projections.

… is known as “exiting“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, YMCA Training, dwp. Tags: , , , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 6 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: "pre-signing"

This potentially fraudulent act involves:

  1. Bullying the client into signing…
    • Blank documents or not filled in forms, Or
    • Incomplete (but partially filled in) forms
  2. Giving the reason as to “save time”, “I will complete the rest later…” and this is typically enforced by inadequate time for the paperwork to reasonably be completed (such as someone already waiting or an unreasonable target i.e. complete everyone’s paperwork by lunchtime).
  3. Threats of dismissal or 6 month sanctions, for non-compliance
  4. Verbally agreeing what you will write

    The fraudulent element is as follows…

  5. Writing something completely different to what was verbally agreed

Or, This fraudulent act involves:

  1. Requiring signature specimens (regardless of any “genuine” reason i.e. security)
  2. Using “Windowing” technique with specimens to make someone appear to have signed some document

… is known as “Pre-signing“; the second definition is more likely to use that term in common dialogue. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: “penciling”

The illegal act of:

  1. Filling in a document with pencil
  2. Getting the client to sign (either in pencil or pen)
  3. Later go over the pencil lines in pen to make a few modifications or rewriting the entire agreement
  4. Erase the pencil lines (if client signs with pencil go over it with a pen first)

Or

  1. Filling in a document with pencil
  2. Getting the client to sign
  3. Erasing certain words, sentences or paragraphs and filling in the gaps with other words or sentences.

… is known as “Penciling“.

If your New Deal provider ever wrote reviews and such like in pencil I would recommend you use the Data Protection Act 1998 to retrieve all the documents they hold on you (failing that if they say they no longer have it, try the Jobcentre) and see whether the content changed

Posted in New Deal, YMCA Training. Tags: , , .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: "windowing"

The illegal forging act of:

  1. Creating a photocopy of a document with the signature you wish to use (thus to prevent marks created from the top of the pen making an impression on the original sheet which enables detection of fraud easier)
  2. Placing the photocopy against a window (hence where the name comes from) or a light box/overhead projector (which gives artificial light if not enough light from a window is available)
  3. Cover the photocopy with the document you wish to have the signature on (the light enables the content of the photocopy to be seen through that document)
  4. Trace the signature (and if you have a steady hand you have a good copy, doesn’t have to be perfect: signatures typically vary slightly)

… is known as “Windowing“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal. Tags: , , , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Pages: Prev ...1 2 3 4 5 6 Next