<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flexible New Deal &#124; New Deal Scandal: Leading Welfare Reform Concerns &#187; Jobseeker’s Allowance Regulations 1996</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/fnd/jobseeker%e2%80%99s-allowance-regulations-1996/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Actively Seeking Employment: Social Security Commissioner Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/24/actively-seeking-employment-social-security-commissioner-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/24/actively-seeking-employment-social-security-commissioner-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[0845 60 60 234]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actively seeking employement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actively seeking work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Work and Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobseeker’s Allowance Regulations 1996]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jocbentre plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Case reference: CJSA 1814 2007
DECISION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
1.	 I allow the appeal. For the reasons below, the decision of the tribunal is wrong in law. It is set aside. With the agreement of both parties, I substitute for that decision the decision that the tribunal should have taken. This is:
Appeal allowed. The decision of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/24/actively-seeking-employment-social-security-commissioner-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
