<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flexible New Deal &#124; New Deal Scandal: Leading Welfare Reform Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Flexible New Deal (Designation of Employment Officers) Order 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/03/02/the-flexible-new-deal-designation-of-employment-officers-order-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/03/02/the-flexible-new-deal-designation-of-employment-officers-order-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Welfare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible new deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Officers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private business delegated jobcentre plus powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Flexible New Deal (Designation of Employment Officers) Order 2009]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those on Flexible New Deal this is the law (The Flexible New Deal (Designation of Employment Officers) Order 2009) that give the power for a private business to refer someone for a benefit sanction. Some providers have limited people who can give sanctions others allow administrators and PAs the ability. We couldn&#8217;t find this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/03/02/the-flexible-new-deal-designation-of-employment-officers-order-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actively Seeking Employment: Social Security Commissioner Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/24/actively-seeking-employment-social-security-commissioner-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/24/actively-seeking-employment-social-security-commissioner-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[0845 60 60 234]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actively seeking employement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actively seeking work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department for Work and Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobseeker’s Allowance Regulations 1996]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jocbentre plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security commissioner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Case reference: CJSA 1814 2007
DECISION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
1.	 I allow the appeal. For the reasons below, the decision of the tribunal is wrong in law. It is set aside. With the agreement of both parties, I substitute for that decision the decision that the tribunal should have taken. This is:
Appeal allowed. The decision of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/24/actively-seeking-employment-social-security-commissioner-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welfare State needs Responsibility</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/20/welfare-state-needs-responsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/20/welfare-state-needs-responsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Welfare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labour Party and Conservative Party are fucking shit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it absolutely disgusting how DWP staff, management and politicians are all exempt from any blame when it comes to benefit entitlement decisions. Today comes the real life scenario of the DWP who turn their backs on people without a care in the world; in this case it was a woman who was forced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/20/welfare-state-needs-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unofficial Jobcentre Plus &amp; Unemployment Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/11/unofficial-jobcentre-plus-unemployment-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/11/unofficial-jobcentre-plus-unemployment-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unofficial Jobcentre Plus & Unemployment Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible new deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new deal fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobcentre plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unofficial Jobcentre Plus &#38; Unemployment Survey
Please spend 10 minutes or so answering the questions so we can gather a better understanding of unemployment and how the Government is handling the issue.
Instead of the usual tick box, checkbox and rating systems, we have decided to allow you to answer in your own words. There is also [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/11/unofficial-jobcentre-plus-unemployment-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flexible New Deal dead already?</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/09/flexible-new-deal-dead-already/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/09/flexible-new-deal-dead-already/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible new deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a few months in the pilot already&#8230;. have the Flexible New Deal flaws been found leaving Flexible New Deal dead in the water? or  Is it just a few problems with Flexible New Deal that needs ironing out? 
Within a month several Flexible New Deal complaints surfaced and many more are coming in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2010/01/09/flexible-new-deal-dead-already/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Deal Scandal archive now available here</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/12/20/new-deal-scandal-archive-now-available-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/12/20/new-deal-scandal-archive-now-available-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible new deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new deal fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new deal scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we relaunch the old (but still relevant) New Deal Scandal website. We have exported the posts and comments from http://newdealscandal.wordpress.com and imported them to http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/ (this website).
This has meant we have lost individual post ratings and the ratings on pages and blog articles.

We have a new rating system on here designed to replace the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/12/20/new-deal-scandal-archive-now-available-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Deal Scandal replaced with Flexible New Deal Scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/31/new-deal-scandal-no-new-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/31/new-deal-scandal-no-new-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feel free to continue commenting.

205 lost or stolen DWP laptops
3 in 4 employers discriminate against disabled people and older ages
Assaults at Jobcentre Plus exposed
£4 New Deal travel deductions are unlawful
Benefit Busters
Department for Work and Pensions Data Scandal
Diary of an unemployed person on New Deal
DWP Examination
Flexible New Deal
Flexible New Deal Info
Flexible New Deal Provider Information
FND
How much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/31/new-deal-scandal-no-new-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FND for Flexible New Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/30/fnd-for-flexible-new-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/30/fnd-for-flexible-new-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[flexible new deal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have launched a new website that redirects to the Flexible New Deal Discussion Forums.
This is designed to be easier to type.http://feedback.flexiblenewdeal.me.uk shortened to http://www.fnd.me.uk
&#160;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/30/fnd-for-flexible-new-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security and Child Support Appeal Tribunal: pathetic!</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/29/social-security-child-support-appeal-tribunal-pathetic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/29/social-security-child-support-appeal-tribunal-pathetic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dwp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I travelled to my Tribunal (details I will post separately) and the whole system is pathetic!
From my experience I have realised that an Appeal Tribunal is simply a tick box to make you feel like you have done your best. After all DWP select the rules (regardless of what the law states) and determines [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/29/social-security-child-support-appeal-tribunal-pathetic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank You</title>
		<link>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/26/thank-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/26/thank-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flexible New Deal New Deal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new deal scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost the end.
Thank you.
I would like to thank (in no particular):

Everyone who has visited Ipswich Unemployed Action, New Deal Scandal, New Deal Complaints, Jobseeker Advice, Flexible New Deal Discussion Boards etc.
Everyone who has contributed to the sites and have used the commenting systems
Everyone who has spread the word &#8211; in person, via the internet or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/2009/10/26/thank-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.471 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-11 19:43:51 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->