The New Deal Scandal: Flexible New Deal blog (http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/) is a part of the Flexible New Deal Scandal Network.

New Deal fraud technique: “misrepresentation”

The illegal act of:

  1. Bidding for a contract to a high specification in order to win the contract (this becomes part of the New Deal contract outlined in Part 3 (“The services”), Section 3 (“Provider obligations”) subsections 3.1.1 and 3.1.5, Schedule 2 (and applicable Annexes) and other applicable sections), Or
  2. Failing to follow Provider Guidance (breach of subsection 3.1.3 of New Deal contract)

    and

  3. Deliberately providing the service different to that promised at tender stage, where the standard is less, where financial cut backs are made to the delivery, understaffed, under resourced and overcrowded premises.

… is known as “misrepresentation“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, YMCA Training, dwp. Tags: , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: “exiting”

The illegal act of:

  1. Acknowledging that regardless of the actual period of time the New Deal participant spends on the course they will get the full amount for the entire 13 weeks, unless they exceed their absence limit where they wont
  2. Short listing those who appear not to be able to make the entire 13 weeks or those who are close to exceeding permitted absence limits to be dismissed – those who seem likely to “drop out” will not award provider with Job Outcome bonuses thus are surplus to requirements and those that are close to the limit regardless of being in their rights and not committing an offence are likely to become a liability to limit the amount projected to be received.
  3. Acknowledging that the Jobseeker cannot appeal or prevent being dismissed, has no rights to find out the reason for dismissal or have a chance to put right/get a second chance,  and that it takes immediate effect.
  4. Short listing random people for dismissal to ease overcrowding of training centres
  5. Making false declarations under oath of a disclaimer claiming reasons for dismissals as rather severe (misconduct, Health and safety concerns etc.) all being lies, knowing that the Dismissal Form has a sole purpose of helping a Decision Maker impose sanctions on a jobseeker, who doesn’t get to see such a form.
  6. Tell the Jobseeker verbally an entire  different story (such as due to attitude, not contributing enough etc.) consisting of rather mild reasons, so when he or she becomes required to give reasons why the training course ended or appeals to a decision of benefit sanctions,  the jobseeker merely complains about something irrelevant to the actual stated reason and becomes sanctioned as a result.
  7. When a Decision Maker writes to the Training Provider, the training provider delays the reply so when the Decision Maker writes to the Jobseeker, he or she doesn’t get a copy of the answers provided as the system is intended to do.
  8. Now that the people were exited – the training providers profit margins further reach the projections.

… is known as “exiting“. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, YMCA Training, dwp. Tags: , , , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 6 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal fraud technique: "pre-signing"

This potentially fraudulent act involves:

  1. Bullying the client into signing…
    • Blank documents or not filled in forms, Or
    • Incomplete (but partially filled in) forms
  2. Giving the reason as to “save time”, “I will complete the rest later…” and this is typically enforced by inadequate time for the paperwork to reasonably be completed (such as someone already waiting or an unreasonable target i.e. complete everyone’s paperwork by lunchtime).
  3. Threats of dismissal or 6 month sanctions, for non-compliance
  4. Verbally agreeing what you will write

    The fraudulent element is as follows…

  5. Writing something completely different to what was verbally agreed

Or, This fraudulent act involves:

  1. Requiring signature specimens (regardless of any “genuine” reason i.e. security)
  2. Using “Windowing” technique with specimens to make someone appear to have signed some document

… is known as “Pre-signing“; the second definition is more likely to use that term in common dialogue. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal should be subjected to a Serious Fraud Office inquiry

All New Deal training providers, past and present should be subject to an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office.  The fraud investigation can’t be conducted by the Department for Work and Pensions as they also fall under the suspicion of fraudulent activity and other acts of unlawful misconduct and requires an outside independent investigation. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Flexible New Deal or flexible New Deal?

Is it Flexible New Deal or flexible New Deal? (notice the lowercase f in flexible)

I have noticed different providers and news sources have displayed Flexible New Deal differently, have I said it wrong saying Flexible New Deal instead of flexible New Deal?

I am aware that its basically is New Deal 2.0 but I have reported it as Flexible New Deal because it is the name of a new programme rather than being a new type under an existing New Deal such as flexible New Deal or inflexible New Deal.

Anyone with the official properly written way of saying it?

Posted in New Deal, dwp, flexible new deal. Tags: , , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 3 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal ends in half of Great Britain

Since Monday, in half the country there will be no new referrals to New Deal. This could be due to implementing the Flexible New Deal or due to revelations of New Deal fraud we recently reported, as the Flexible New Deal (if contracts are signed on time) are not due to begin until October allowing a 13 week programme to commence this week.

Posted in New Deal, Welfare Reform, dwp, flexible new deal. Tags: , , , , .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal Scandal record hits DOUBLE on news of A4e Fraud

At only 19:55 BST the record number of unique visitors on this blog today has beaten the previous record a week ago (22nd June 2009) by 2 times and has tripled the daily average number of unique visitors. It seems everyone is very interested in the A4E fraud so we will bring more revelations on Action 4 Employment in the future.

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 6 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

A4e to lose Flexible New Deal contract for fraud: other training providers also under investigation

The Department for Work and Pensions has been investigating Action 4 Employment and at least 2 other undisclosed training providers for fraud over the last 13 months – this comes after Maatwerk had their contract terminated for fraud.

This means that even though they weren’t restricted or blacklisted from bidding for Flexible New Deal contracts: they will now lose the Flexible New Deal contracts after at least 20 cases of fraud have been discovered in May 2008 at A4e in Hull where two staff members falsified forms meant for the employer and also forged signatures on the forms in order to receive job outcome bonuses from DWP.

Action 4 Employment was also involved in a temporary job recruitment agency scam – thus forcing New Deal participants into temporary work which resulted in more job outcome bonuses from DWP.

Another New Deal provider has been forced to repay £48,000 for fraud – the name of the provider hasn’t been disclosed.

The DWP was happy to pay Pertemps PDG over 2 million when a report clearly stated fraud – in this instance no concerns other than as a report were raised.

Also, so far all fraud cases were consisting of forged signatures on forms and such like – the DWP have not yet picked up on timesheet abuses (paid to be there for x hours, as shown on timesheets, but participants are there for significantly less i.e. 10 hours instead of 30), dismissal abuses (dismissing participants for false or trivial reasons to receive full 13 weeks amount without them being there for even half that time), guaranteed jobs bonuses abuse (some participants have received a job offer before having to do the course starting 2-6 weeks after the course starts, providers still get job outcome payments intended as a bonus if they get the participant work, even if they had nothing to do with it) and future job outcome bonuses abuse (getting participants to enter an agreement where the provider has “permission” to contact any future employer after the course has ended to get job outcome bonus even though you got the job after the course unaided by them) to name a few.

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, Working Links, dwp, flexible new deal. Tags: , , , , , , , , , .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 10 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Guide to Decision Makers Guide (DMG)

This is a quick guide on the Department for Work and Pensions‘ Decision Makers Guide… Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 7 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 Next