Actively Seeking Employment: Social Security Commissioner Decision

Case reference: CJSA 1814 2007

DECISION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER

1.  I allow the appeal. For the reasons below, the decision of the tribunal is wrong in law. It is set aside. With the agreement of both parties, I substitute for that decision the decision that the tribunal should have taken. This is:

Appeal allowed. The decision of the Secretary of State of 9 11 2006, superseding the decision of 28 3 2006, is set aside. The appellant was actively seeking work in the period 31 10 2006 to 6 11 2006. That is therefore not a ground for superseding the decision awarding jobseeker’s allowance to the appellant during that period.

For the avoidance of doubt, this means that there is no break in the appellant’s entitlement to jobseeker’s allowance for the period 31 10 2006 to 6 11 2006. He does not therefore need to make a new claim for that or the following period. He is also entitled to any relevant credited earnings for contribution purposes for the period.

2.  The claimant and appellant (C) is appealing with my permission against the decision of the Worcester tribunal on 5 02 2007 under reference 055 06 00550.
Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Welfare State needs Responsibility

I find it absolutely disgusting how DWP staff, management and politicians are all exempt from any blame when it comes to benefit entitlement decisions. Today comes the real life scenario of the DWP who turn their backs on people without a care in the world; in this case it was a woman who was forced to suicide taking her young child with her.

Whereas to most people who fall victim to the dark side of the welfare state having to live deeper into poverty perhaps commiting crime to survive; regardless of the situation there needs to be responsibility for actions.

First, the computer systems list your personal circumstances and this shall be taken into consideration when making the decision. In this example maybe she had an 8 month gap in 5 years making her not entitled to the benefit but didn’t they overlook that she also has a child? Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Welfare Reform, dwp, human rights, uk government. Tags: .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 3 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Unofficial Jobcentre Plus & Unemployment Survey

Unofficial Jobcentre Plus & Unemployment Survey

Please spend 10 minutes or so answering the questions so we can gather a better understanding of unemployment and how the Government is handling the issue.

Instead of the usual tick box, checkbox and rating systems, we have decided to allow you to answer in your own words. There is also an opportunity to rate each area out of 10. We will allow answers by comments to the article so to show they are not distorted in any way. Questions are simplified for easy understanding without requiring the concentration of an examination!

New Deal Scandal is running this survey because no one else offers such an impartial indepth open survey not limited by closed questions or tickbox selections which can be interpreted in many different ways. Your views are really important to us and will help shape the future of welfare. There are 12 questions in total.

The questions are as follows:

Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Flexible New Deal dead already?

It has been a few months in the pilot already…. have the Flexible New Deal flaws been found leaving Flexible New Deal dead in the water? or  Is it just a few problems with Flexible New Deal that needs ironing out?  Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, Welfare Reform, dwp, flexible new deal, uk government. Tags: , .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 6 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal Scandal archive now available here

Today we relaunch the old (but still relevant) New Deal Scandal website. We have exported the posts and comments from http://newdealscandal.wordpress.com and imported them to http://www.newdealscandal.co.uk/flexiblenewdeal/ (this website).

This has meant we have lost individual post ratings and the ratings on pages and blog articles. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp, flexible new deal, new deal fraud, uk government. Tags: .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 4 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Social Security and Child Support Appeal Tribunal: pathetic!

Today, I travelled to my Tribunal (details I will post separately) and the whole system is pathetic!

From my experience I have realised that an Appeal Tribunal is simply a tick box to make you feel like you have done your best. After all DWP select the rules (regardless of what the law states) and determines how it is applied. An Appeal Tribunal only advises DWP of what action should be taken. They have no enforcement powers. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in dwp.
14 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 5 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Save Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance

SAVE DLA AND ALL DISABILITY BENEFITS
Tony Greenstein

Having already abolished Incapacity Benefit, New Labour has now made it clear that it wants to scrap ALL disability benefits. On July 14th New Labour published a Green Paper, Shaping the Future of Care. Reading through the spin, the message is clear. Disability Living Allowance is ‘inefficient’ ‘poorly targeted’ [because it’s not means tested!] and therefore has to go towards paying for a new national care service. Disability Living Allowance is the best benefit there is. If your needs are great enough, if you cannot care and need help with bodily functions for part or all of the day (and night) you are eligible for Disability Living Allowance. There are 3 bands – lower, middle and higher. Receipt of Disability Living Allowance does not overlap with other benefits and is not counted as taxable income.

The result is that people who are the most vulnerable and sick in this society see a small increase in their standard of living. This is what New Labour hate most of all. The proposal is to use the money for ‘individual budgets’ run by private companies, whereby the disabled, in agreement with the local authority, can spend the money on care. Of course they’ll never actually see the money!! The whole system will be discretionary and, of course, liable to cuts. Anyone with any experience of the existing system of individual budgets knows what a nightmare the whole system is.

The Green Paper talks about abolishing Attendance Allowance which is paid to those 65 and over (Attendance Allowance is the equivalent of the care component of Disability Living Allowance). Instead they intend to force the elderly to pay £20,000 to insure themselves!! The Green Paper talks about replacing not just Attendance Allowance but ‘disability benefits’ – a clear sign that it is not just Attendance Allowance which is in their sights. And the Green Paper dresses up its purpose with the usual New Labour waffle such as proclaiming that “our aspiration (is) to build a stronger, fairer Britain.”

The Attlee Government of 1945-51, which was a right-wing cold war Labour government, introduced the building blocs of the welfare state which New Labour is intent on dismantling. They introduced the 1948 National Assistance Act intended to act as a safety net for those who fell below a certain level of income.

Successive Labour and Tory Governments built on Attlee’s measures. E.g. Disability Living Allowance was introduced by the Major Government in 1992 New Labour has abolished Incapacity Benefit and all but scrapped Income Support. Those who propagate the idea that New Labour is ‘better’ than the Tories and base their strategy on that are deceiving themselves and others..

New Labour prefers a welfare state for bankers in distress, and their ‘benefits’ are paid via stuffing their mouths with gold, whilst expecting the poorest and most deprived sections of the community to pay for it. Meanwhile the leadership of the Trade Unions, like the three wise monkeys, hear nothing, see nothing and say nothing. And more to the point – do nothing. Disability Living Allowance is used to pay for the extra costs that result from being disabled. For example my own son is autistic.

One of the consequences of this is that he is always breaking things, including windows! Disability Living Allowance pays for this. It also enables him to be taken out by his parents, to enjoy videos and DVDs and live as near as possible a normal life including holidays. This is the kind of thing that New Labour is determined to prevent and in its place will be a free-market, semi-privatised, bureaucratically driven National Care Agency which will determine what the needs of the disabled are. Disabled Charities Collaborate with Government The disabled charity sector – Disability Alliance, Mencap and all the other charities who make a good living off the back of the disabled – are the Government’s first port of call.

These so-called ‘representatives’ of the disabled, although no one has ever elected these middle-class worthies, most of whom are not disabled, to this role, are now rolling over to accept New Labour’s latest spin. Their idea of a ‘campaign’ is to get people to take part in the Government’s ‘consultation exercise’. Now no one is suggesting that people boycott the consultation, but to make that the only part of your ‘campaign’ is to fool people into believing that any New Labour ‘consultation’ is actually a genuine exercise, rather than an attempt to convince those they are targetting that New Labour’s medicine will be good for them.

On 1st September Michelle Holland of the Disability Alliance wrote to me saying it was untrue that they supported the abolition of Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance. She suggested writing to one’s MP and take part in the government consultation. Ms Holland boasted that ‘We are members of the Disability Benefit Consortium… We meet regularly with the Department for Work and Pensions and HM Revenue and Customs on a range of benefits related issues.’

Err quite and look where it’s got you. On October 16th Ms Holland followed this up with another letter urging that I contact my MP and assuring me that ‘We are building as robust a defence of Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance as possible and will be trying to demonstrate that.’ Which entirely misses the point that the government’s exercise is not conducted in good faith. The proposals for a national care system are designed to hide the fact that their main goal is the abolition of a benefit that costs over £10 billion a year. When you’ve got hungry bankers to feed, then it is clear what your priorities are.

I therefore wrote back to Ms Holland about her ‘campaign’ asking: ‘Where are the thousands of posters, the meetings, the town hall rallies, the leaflets to MPs securing firm commitments in the run-up to the General Election? Instead you prefer quiet words behind doors with those seeking to find the money to fund the public borrowing deficit incurred as a result of a welfare state that primarily caters today for Bankers and other parasites.

To be blunt your role is an absolute disgrace and since you intend to do nothing it’s about time that the spotlight was turned on people like you who purport to represent the disabled when in actual fact you do nothing but sell them out.’ In fact I had already written to my MP, and the Minister for Disabled, Jonathan Shaw wrote back thus in a letter of 12 October: ‘’Many people and charities, such as Disability Alliance, Mencap, Age Concern and Help the Aged have told us they welcome the chance to discuss and engage [i.e collaborate] with us on these important issues.’

The Fight is on to Save ALL Disability Benefits including Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance (for the 65s and over).

Posted in Benefit Busters, Welfare Reform, dwp, uk government. Tags: , .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 1 Comment »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal is bad for your health

New Deal is bad for your health! Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp, flexible new deal, human rights, uk government. Tags: , , , , , .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 21 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Jobcentre Plus Labour Market System

New Deal Scandal exposes the scam that is the Labour Market System (LMS) or simply put the pool of jobs Employment Officers, New Deal Personal Advisers and Jobseeker Direct staff give to jobseekers as Jobseeker Directions and those on the jobpoints and the direct gov and jobcentre plus websites. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

A4e only checks half of claims before claiming job outcomes

Taken from Watching A4e’s Two Memoranda article:

A4e says that it has introduced a procedure whereby 50% of all claims are routinely checked by an independent team which phones the employer to verify that the client is working there, and can check with the Jobcentre that the client is off benefit.

Whats the point of getting an independent team to check just half of the claims to see if they are genuine? Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, Welfare Reform, dwp, emma harrison, flexible new deal, new deal fraud. Tags: , , , .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 10 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

7260 New Deal vacancies advertised in the last year

New Deal Scandal can confirm (after an Freedom of Information Act request) Jobcentre Plus in the last 12 months ending the 30th September 2009 has advertised 7260 New Deal Jobs.

This is just over an average of 600 New Deal vacancies each month. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Where is the Flexible New Deal Ombudsman?

So, with Flexible New Deal jobseekers are meant to have the following privileges:

  • Customer Choice“: ability to (in some areas) choose provider
  • Receiving a statement: stating expectations, how the provider is paid and how they can complain to the Ombudsman
  • Independent Ombudsman: as a last resort to complain to

Flexible New Deal providers get the following extra privileges:

  • Employment Officer” status (can contact a Decision Maker and apply for 6 month sanctions)

Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Welfare Reform, dwp, flexible new deal, human rights, uk government. Tags: , , .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 5 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Victim of Fraud: A4e or the Taxpayer?

You the blog reader may decide. Emma Harrison claims that A4e is a victim of fraud… really?

Not exactly a new issue or article worthy of being called “news”, however, I would like to report corporate happenings behind big businesses such as A4e. New Deal Scandal already reported about an director of A4e of the highest senior rank in regards to finance, stepping down/being demoted after reports of fraud within A4e, which almost got this website shut down. He still works for the company in a more junior role underneath the new finance director.

Now we have a snippet from Emma Harrison stating how A4e uses a PR team and lawyers to bully their way out of any blame. Now, lets not forget even though a business has the right to protect themselves i.e. their reputation, A4e did attempt to shut down this blog and were on the route to even suing me for solely stating that Companies House had recorded that a director who works in finance has resigned his directorship – this comes after allegations of fraud were reported at A4e.

A4e being a company funded by taxpayers money means taxpayers have the right to know basic public accessible information such as management changes within contracted out services.  A4e claimed this was libel and was intended as a malice attempt to attack their (allegedly) good reputation.  The truth is, even though they have to file such documents by law they wanted this suspicious (although not necessarily guilty) activity kept quiet.  Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, New Deal, dwp, emma harrison, flexible new deal, new deal fraud, uk government. Tags: , , , , .
10 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Deal Scandal number one on Yahoo for Flexible New Deal

I am proud to acknowledge that New Deal Scandal is #1 for Flexible New Deal on Yahoo – this is above all providers. Screenshot enclosed. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in 1, New Deal, dwp, flexible new deal, new deal fraud, uk government. Tags: , .
18 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Jobcentre Plus forces jobseekers to sign empty pages

It has become more than a coincidence personally of being required to sign a declaration on a blank page. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in dwp, uk government. Tags: .
123 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 6 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Jobcentre Plus promotes illegal job vacancies

New Deal Scandal can reveal that not only does Jobcentre Plus promote illegal jobs but Department for Work and Pensions actually creates unlawful discriminative employment vacancies. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, Welfare Reform, dwp, flexible new deal, uk government. Tags: , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 25 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Flexible New Deal? New Deal Scandal is Number 3 on Google!

I am proud to acknowledge that New Deal Scandal is #3 for Flexible New Deal on Google – this is above all providers. Screenshot enclosed. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp, flexible new deal, new deal fraud, uk government. Tags: , .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

DWP = Dismissed With Prejudice???

OK, we know the Government department is called the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) but what more likely could DWP stand for? Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, dwp, uk government. Tags: , , , .
13 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 9 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

DWP Code Cracked

As wordpress kept messing up, the third time… I given up on the introduction paragraph.

This is a New Deal Scandal exclusive! Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in New Deal, Welfare Reform, dwp, flexible new deal, uk government. Tags: .
12 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. Be the first to comment! »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Is Jobseekers Allowance actually enough to live on?

We have previously highlighted the Jobseekers Allowance Scandal of how the weekly rate doesn’t include any money to seek employment and what the £64.30 weekly payment is intended to cover.

We will now highlight “How generous is Jobseekers Allowance?” and further criticise the amount of JSA.

Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Government keeps Ipswich Detention Centre open

£64.30 weekly jobseekers allowance broken into costs

New Deal Scandal can today reveal the official DWP response of how the £64.50 (over 25) Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) is calculated, after the Department for Work and Pensions responded to a Freedom of Information Act request. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Jobseekers in Recession spend up to 20% of their benefit seeking employment

New Deal Scandal can reveal that Jobseekers on average are spending up to a fifth (20%) of their benefit seeking employment in the recession. Jobseekers Allowance is the minimum the law says you need to live on. This doesn’t include costs of seeking employment. TUC states this should be increased to £75 per week.

Jobseekers Allowance Rates

Type Amount Cost % of ASE Net Amount of Jobseekers Allowance*

Single (18-24)          £50.95          17.67%               £41.95
Single  (25+)            £64.30           14%                     £55.30
Couples                      £100.95        16.84%              £83.95  (£41.98 each)

Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in dwp, uk government. Tags: , , , .
125 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 4 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

A4e Hull Benefit Busters Episode 2: now on 4oD

New Deal Scandal can reveal that Episode 2 of Benefit Busters is now back online on the Channel 4 websiteRead more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, New Deal, dwp, emma harrison. Tags: , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Watch the pulled Episode 2 of Benefit Busters here!

Watch the controversial episode of Channel 4’s Benefit Busters Series 1 at A4e Hull here. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, dwp. Tags: , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 3 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Benefit Busters Episode 2: Channel 4 pulls Episode 2 preview clips

New Deal Scandal can reveal that Channel 4 has finally pulled the preview clips for Episode 2.

It has caused great controversy when Channel 4 decided to pull the Episode 2 Benefit Busters show from 4od and Virgin Media On Demand service while scrapping the repeat showing too.

There was confusion where most people were advised it wasn’t available due to Channel 4 not having the rights to show it on 4oD On Demand. This extended when cancelling the repeat slot and replacing it with another programme.

Finally, we hear it was due to someone complaining as they were shown in the programme. Only as of today the 2nd September has Channel 4 finally pulled the preview clips (even though Episode 2 of the programme was pulled last week). Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, New Deal, dwp. Tags: , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 2 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Did the Government get A4e Benefit Busters Episode 2 pulled from On Demand?

We had recently reported that possibly A4e had pulled Benefit Busters Epidsode 2 from the TV repeat and On Demand services.

Last night there was concerns that maybe the Government was involved in pulling the show off the air and off the internet. Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Did A4e get Benefit Busters Episode 2 pulled from On Demand?

It seems that Channel 4’s Benefit Busters Episode 2 was pulled from Virgin Media On Demand service and the online 4od service. Why?

Rumour has it that perhaps A4e ordered the On Demand/Catch Up availability to be removed due to concerned pressures over the services provided which could lose them their Flexible New Deal contracts (?) and also there has been next to none reviews of the Episode 2 Long-term Unemployed show in the press.

I am aware that it was added to On Demand but since it has been pulled and “Dolce Vito – Dream Restaurant” replaced the 9pm Channel 4 slot on Thursday’s the 27th August On Demand (even though this programme was on at 8.30pm).

It also is reported that the repeat show has been dropped from Mondays listings.

Is A4e censoring the internet once again and goign a step further with the press?

Read more on New Deal Scandal »

Posted in Action 4 Employment, Benefit Busters, New Deal, dwp, flexible new deal. Tags: , , , , , , , , .
11 views (since 20/12/2009) - RSS. 12 Comments »
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 Next